
While shaking hands with voters during an event at the State University of New York at Purchase, Greenpeace USA activist Eva Resnick-Day asked the Democratic presidential candidate if she would reject fossil fuel money.
The question clearly aggravated Clinton, who immediately snapped back. “I am so sick -- I am so sick of the Sanders campaign lying about me. I am sick of it,” she said.
Greenpeace USA subsequently posted the video online. It was shot in partnership with the environmental group 350 Action.
The Sanders campaign fired back at Clinton’s assertion saying that she
has taken contributions from lobbyists for fossil fuel companies.
According to FactCheck.org, Clinton’s campaign has not accepted any direct contributions from an oil or gas corporation.
A Greenpeace report
found that Clinton has received over $1 million from lobbyists and
bunddlers connected to the fossil fuel industry and that her Super PAC has received over $3 million from donors in the industry.
Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill released the following statement in
response to Clinton's exchange with the Greenpeace activist. In the
statement, he accuses the Sanders campaign of "misleading voters" with
its attacks -- and says Sanders has taken $50,000 from oil and gas
companies.
"Hillary Clinton has a proven record of leadership when it comes to
combatting climate change and has fought against fossil fuel interests
for decades. On this campaign, she has laid out tangible, ambitious
goals to make America the clean energy superpower of the 21st century
and has repeatedly called for eliminating tax breaks for oil and gas
companies. The more than one million people who have contributed to her
campaign know exactly where she stands on these issues. The simple truth
is that this campaign has not taken a dollar from oil and gas industry
PACs or corporations. The simple fact is that the Sanders campaign is
misleading voters with their attacks. The money in question is from
individuals who work for these companies. By the same metric, Bernie
Sanders has taken more than $50,000 on this campaign from individuals
working for oil and gas companies. Assuming they don’t believe their own
candidate is bought by the fossil fuel industry, they should stop the
false attacks and do what they’ve claimed the campaign is about:
debating the issues.”
No comments:
Post a Comment